Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Mali
Mali: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) was 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Mali, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Mali stood at 5.5 DB15-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Mali peaked at 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2003 and was at its lowest, 5.5 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.
Mali ranks 34th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Mali, year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2004 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | 7 |
| 2010s | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | 10 |
Countries ranked near Mali
- 34 Pakistan 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Mexico 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Brazil 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Austria 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Belarus 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Benin 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Burkina Faso 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Cameroon 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Central African Republic 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Chad 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Colombia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Comoros 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Congo 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Côte d'Ivoire 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Czechia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Djibouti 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Dominican Republic 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Equatorial Guinea 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Estonia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Gabon 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Georgia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Greece 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Guinea 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Guinea-Bissau 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Israel 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Italy 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Kenya 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Republic of Korea 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Madagascar 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Mauritius 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Morocco 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Niger 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Philippines 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Portugal 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Senegal 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Taiwan, China 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Togo 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Tunisia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Mali
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3081 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4025 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 11.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4728 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 39.47 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 47.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.19 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Mali?
- Resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Mali was 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Mali?
- The highest recorded value was 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Mali?
- The lowest recorded value was 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- How does Mali rank for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6)?
- Mali ranks 34th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) rising or falling in Mali?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Mali data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The management of debtor's assets index has six components: (i) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can continue performing contracts essential to the debtor’s survival; (ii) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can reject overly burdensome contracts; (iii) whether undervalued transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (iv) whether transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings that give preference to one or several creditors can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (v) whether the insolvency framework includes specific provisions that allow the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf), after commencement of insolvency proceedings, to obtain financing necessary to function during the proceedings; and (vi) whether post-commencement finance receives priority over ordinary unsecured creditors during distribution of assets.