Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Thailand: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4)
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Thailand
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Thailand, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 40th and Thailand ranks 40th of 191 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5714 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 1.43 DB15-20 methodology | Thailand |
| 2010s | 0.6 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 1.4 DB15-20 methodology | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4), Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Thailand?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Thailand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Thailand?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Thailand?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Thailand rank globally for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 40th and Thailand ranks 40th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insolvency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.