China vs Seychelles: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4)
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) over time
- China
- Seychelles
How they compare
China currently reports 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Seychelles, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Seychelles has been ahead every year.
China ranks 40th and Seychelles ranks 40th of 190 countries.
Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2857 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 0.7143 DB15-20 methodology | Seychelles |
| 2010s | 1.1 DB15-20 methodology | 1.6 DB15-20 methodology | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4), China or Seychelles?
- China, at 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Seychelles as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) between China and Seychelles?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Seychelles?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do China and Seychelles rank globally for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
- China ranks 40th and Seychelles ranks 40th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insolvency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.