Statizoid

Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Libya

Libya: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
2 DB15-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
116th
of 190 countries
All-time high
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
All-time low
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Libya, 2003–2019

00.511.522003201120192003: 2 DB15-20 methodology2004: 2 DB15-20 methodology2005: 2 DB15-20 methodology2006: 2 DB15-20 methodology2007: 2 DB15-20 methodology2008: 2 DB15-20 methodology2009: 2 DB15-20 methodology2010: 2 DB15-20 methodology2011: 2 DB15-20 methodology2012: 2 DB15-20 methodology2013: 2 DB15-20 methodology2014: 2 DB15-20 methodology2015: 2 DB15-20 methodology2016: 2 DB15-20 methodology2017: 2 DB15-20 methodology2018: 2 DB15-20 methodology2019: 2 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Libya stood at 2 DB15-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Libya peaked at 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003 and was at its lowest, 2 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.

That places Libya 116th out of 190 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 7
2010s 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 10

Countries ranked near Libya

  1. 116 Bangladesh 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 116 India 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 116 Nigeria 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 116 Afghanistan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 116 Angola 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  6. 116 Antigua and Barbuda 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  7. 116 Bahamas 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  8. 116 Belarus 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  9. 116 Belize 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  10. 116 Benin 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  11. 116 Bhutan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  12. 116 Burkina Faso 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  13. 116 Cameroon 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  14. 116 Central African Republic 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  15. 116 Chad 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  16. 116 Comoros 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  17. 116 Democratic Republic of Congo 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  18. 116 Congo 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  19. 116 Cote d'Ivoire 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  20. 116 Dominica 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  21. 116 Ecuador 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  22. 116 El Salvador 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  23. 116 Equatorial Guinea 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  24. 116 Eritrea 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  25. 116 Ethiopia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  26. 116 Fiji 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  27. 116 Gabon 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  28. 116 Ghana 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  29. 116 Guatemala 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  30. 116 Guinea 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  31. 116 Guinea-Bissau 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  32. 116 Guyana 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  33. 116 Haiti 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  34. 116 Honduras 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  35. 116 Hong Kong 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  36. 116 Iran 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  37. 116 Iraq 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  38. 116 Kiribati 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  39. 116 Kuwait 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  40. 116 Laos 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  41. 116 Lebanon 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  42. 116 Madagascar 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  43. 116 Maldives 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  44. 116 Mali 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  45. 116 Mauritania 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  46. 116 Mongolia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  47. 116 Myanmar 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  48. 116 Nepal 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  49. 116 Nicaragua 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  50. 116 Niger 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  51. 116 Oman 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  52. 116 Papua New Guinea 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  53. 116 Qatar 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  54. 116 Sao Tome and Principe 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  55. 116 Senegal 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  56. 116 Sierra Leone 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  57. 116 Solomon Islands 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  58. 116 Saint Lucia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  59. 116 Sudan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  60. 116 Syria 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  61. 116 Togo 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  62. 116 Tonga 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  63. 116 Tunisia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  64. 116 Ukraine 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  65. 116 United Arab Emirates 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  66. 116 Vanuatu 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  67. 116 Venezuela 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  68. 116 Palestine 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  69. 116 Yemen 2 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Libya

All data for Libya →

Frequently asked questions

What is resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Libya?
Resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Libya was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Libya?
The highest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
What is the lowest resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Libya?
The lowest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
How does Libya rank for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
Libya ranks 116th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Is resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) rising or falling in Libya?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Libya data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Libya. Statizoid. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-commencement-of-proceedings-index-0-3-db15-20-methodology/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-commencement-of-proceedings-index-0-3-db15-20-methodology/libya/">Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Libya</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,230 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commence­ment of insolvency proceedings.