Ecuador vs Libya: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Ecuador
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Libya
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Ecuador rank
116th
Libya rank
116th
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Ecuador
- Libya
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Libya, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 116th and Libya ranks 116th of 190 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.5 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 0.5 DB15-20 methodology | Libya |
| 2010s | 1.75 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 0.25 DB15-20 methodology | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Ecuador or Libya?
- Ecuador, at 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Libya as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Ecuador and Libya?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Libya?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Libya rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Ecuador ranks 116th and Libya ranks 116th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.