Statizoid

Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Democratic Republic of the Congo

Democratic Republic of the Congo: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
2 DB15-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
116th
of 190 countries
All-time high
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
All-time low
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2003–2019

00.511.522003201120192003: 2 DB15-20 methodology2004: 2 DB15-20 methodology2005: 2 DB15-20 methodology2006: 2 DB15-20 methodology2007: 2 DB15-20 methodology2008: 2 DB15-20 methodology2009: 2 DB15-20 methodology2010: 2 DB15-20 methodology2011: 2 DB15-20 methodology2012: 2 DB15-20 methodology2013: 2 DB15-20 methodology2014: 2 DB15-20 methodology2015: 2 DB15-20 methodology2016: 2 DB15-20 methodology2017: 2 DB15-20 methodology2018: 2 DB15-20 methodology2019: 2 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

Democratic Republic of the Congo recorded 2 DB15-20 methodology for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Democratic Republic of the Congo peaked at 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003 and was at its lowest, 2 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 116th of 190 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 7
2010s 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 10

Countries ranked near Democratic Republic of the Congo

  1. 116 Bangladesh 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 116 India 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 116 Nigeria 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 116 Afghanistan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 116 Angola 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  6. 116 Antigua and Barbuda 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  7. 116 Bahamas 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  8. 116 Belarus 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  9. 116 Belize 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  10. 116 Benin 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  11. 116 Bhutan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  12. 116 Burkina Faso 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  13. 116 Cameroon 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  14. 116 Central African Republic 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  15. 116 Chad 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  16. 116 Comoros 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  17. 116 Congo 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  18. 116 Côte d'Ivoire 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  19. 116 Dominica 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  20. 116 Ecuador 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  21. 116 El Salvador 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  22. 116 Equatorial Guinea 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  23. 116 Eritrea 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  24. 116 Ethiopia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  25. 116 Fiji 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  26. 116 Gabon 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  27. 116 Ghana 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  28. 116 Guatemala 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  29. 116 Guinea 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  30. 116 Guinea-Bissau 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  31. 116 Guyana 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  32. 116 Haiti 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  33. 116 Honduras 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  34. 116 Hong Kong (China) 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  35. 116 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  36. 116 Iraq 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  37. 116 Kiribati 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  38. 116 Kuwait 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  39. 116 Lao People's Democratic Republic 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  40. 116 Lebanon 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  41. 116 Libya 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  42. 116 Madagascar 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  43. 116 Maldives 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  44. 116 Mali 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  45. 116 Mauritania 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  46. 116 Mongolia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  47. 116 Myanmar 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  48. 116 Nepal 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  49. 116 Nicaragua 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  50. 116 Niger 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  51. 116 Oman 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  52. 116 Papua New Guinea 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  53. 116 Qatar 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  54. 116 Sao Tome and Principe 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  55. 116 Senegal 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  56. 116 Sierra Leone 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  57. 116 Solomon Islands 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  58. 116 Saint Lucia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  59. 116 Sudan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  60. 116 Syrian Arab Republic 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  61. 116 Togo 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  62. 116 Tonga 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  63. 116 Tunisia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  64. 116 Ukraine 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  65. 116 United Arab Emirates 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  66. 116 Vanuatu 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  67. 116 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  68. 116 State of Palestine 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  69. 116 Yemen 2 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Democratic Republic of the Congo

All data for Democratic Republic of the Congo →

Frequently asked questions

What is resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Democratic Republic of the Congo was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Democratic Republic of the Congo?
The highest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
What is the lowest resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Democratic Republic of the Congo?
The lowest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
How does Democratic Republic of the Congo rank for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 116th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Is resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) rising or falling in Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Democratic Republic of the Congo data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Democratic Republic of the Congo. Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-commencement-of-proceedings-index-0-3-db15-20-methodology/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-commencement-of-proceedings-index-0-3-db15-20-methodology/congo-dem-rep/">Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Democratic Republic of the Congo</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,230 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commence­ment of insolvency proceedings.