Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Mali
Mali: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Mali, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Mali is 2 DB15-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Mali peaked at 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003 and was at its lowest, 2 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.
Mali ranks 117th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Mali, year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2004 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 7 |
| 2010s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 10 |
Countries ranked near Mali
- 117 Bangladesh 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 India 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Nigeria 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Afghanistan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Angola 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Antigua and Barbuda 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Bahamas 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Belarus 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Belize 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Benin 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Bhutan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Burkina Faso 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Cameroon 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Central African Republic 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Chad 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Comoros 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Congo 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Côte d'Ivoire 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Dominica 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Ecuador 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 El Salvador 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Equatorial Guinea 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Eritrea 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Ethiopia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Fiji 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Gabon 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Ghana 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Guatemala 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Guinea 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Guinea-Bissau 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Guyana 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Haiti 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Honduras 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Hong Kong, China 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Iraq 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Kiribati 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Kuwait 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Lao People's Democratic Republic 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Lebanon 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Libya 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Madagascar 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Maldives 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Mauritania 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Mongolia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Myanmar 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Nepal 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Nicaragua 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Niger 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Oman 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Papua New Guinea 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Qatar 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Sao Tome and Principe 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Senegal 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Sierra Leone 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Solomon Islands 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Saint Lucia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Sudan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Syrian Arab Republic 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Togo 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Tonga 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Tunisia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Ukraine 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 United Arab Emirates 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Vanuatu 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Palestine, State of 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Yemen 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Mali
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3081 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4025 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 11.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4728 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 39.47 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 47.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.19 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Mali?
- Resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Mali was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Mali?
- The highest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Mali?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- How does Mali rank for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Mali ranks 117th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) rising or falling in Mali?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Mali data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.