Libya vs Papua New Guinea: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3)
Libya
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Libya rank
117th
Papua New Guinea rank
117th
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) over time
- Libya
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Libya currently reports 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 117th and Papua New Guinea ranks 117th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2010s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3), Libya or Papua New Guinea?
- Libya, at 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) between Libya and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Papua New Guinea?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Libya and Papua New Guinea rank globally for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Libya ranks 117th and Papua New Guinea ranks 117th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.