Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Antigua and Barbuda
Antigua and Barbuda: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Antigua and Barbuda, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Antigua and Barbuda stood at 2 DB15-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Antigua and Barbuda peaked at 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003 and was at its lowest, 2 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.
That places Antigua and Barbuda 117th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Antigua and Barbuda, year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2004 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 7 |
| 2010s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 10 |
Countries ranked near Antigua and Barbuda
- 117 Bangladesh 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 India 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Nigeria 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Afghanistan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Angola 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Bahamas 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Belarus 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Belize 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Benin 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Bhutan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Burkina Faso 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Cameroon 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Central African Republic 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Chad 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Comoros 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Democratic Republic of Congo 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Congo 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Cote d'Ivoire 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Dominica 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Ecuador 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 El Salvador 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Equatorial Guinea 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Eritrea 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Ethiopia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Fiji 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Gabon 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Ghana 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Guatemala 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Guinea 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Guinea-Bissau 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Guyana 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Haiti 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Honduras 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Hong Kong 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Iran 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Iraq 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Kiribati 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Kuwait 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Laos 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Lebanon 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Libya 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Madagascar 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Maldives 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Mali 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Mauritania 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Mongolia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Myanmar 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Nepal 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Nicaragua 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Niger 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Oman 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Papua New Guinea 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Qatar 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Sao Tome and Principe 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Senegal 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Sierra Leone 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Solomon Islands 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Saint Lucia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Sudan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Syria 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Togo 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Tonga 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Tunisia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Ukraine 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 United Arab Emirates 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Vanuatu 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Venezuela 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Palestine 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 117 Yemen 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Antigua and Barbuda
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0042 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0111 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0153 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0153 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0141 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0035 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0493 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0671 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Antigua and Barbuda?
- Resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Antigua and Barbuda was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Antigua and Barbuda?
- The highest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Antigua and Barbuda?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- How does Antigua and Barbuda rank for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 117th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) rising or falling in Antigua and Barbuda?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Antigua and Barbuda data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.