Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kiribati
Kiribati: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.4186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Kiribati, 2004–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Kiribati stood at -0.4186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. That is the highest value across all 22 years on record.
That represents a change of up 22.4% on the previous year and up 38.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Kiribati peaked at -0.4186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025 and was at its lowest, -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2013.
That places Kiribati 130th out of 206 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 22 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kiribati, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | -0.4842 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 2005 | -0.9716 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +100.7% |
| 2006 | -0.9735 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2007 | -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.3% |
| 2008 | -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.8% |
| 2009 | -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.2% |
| 2010 | -1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.7% |
| 2011 | -1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2012 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.5% |
| 2013 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | -0.6877 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -42.6% |
| 2015 | -0.6857 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3% |
| 2016 | -0.7 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.1% |
| 2017 | -0.6986 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2018 | -0.6978 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2019 | -0.523 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -25.1% |
| 2020 | -0.5681 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.6% |
| 2021 | -0.5689 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2022 | -0.554 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.6% |
| 2023 | -0.6164 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.3% |
| 2024 | -0.5394 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.5% |
| 2025 | -0.4186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.4% |
Kiribati compared with similar countries
- Kiribati's -0.4186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.6455 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 65% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Kiribati's -0.4186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is -0.0624 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 6.7× the median. (34 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kiribati changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | -100.7% | -0.4842 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9716 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2014 | +42.6% | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6877 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.9449 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4842 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
| 2010s | -0.8775 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.523 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.5442 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6164 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kiribati
- 127 Bosnia and Herzegovina -0.4037 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 128 Palestine -0.4065 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 129 Guyana -0.4066 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 131 Tuvalu -0.4418 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 132 Brazil -0.4419 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 133 Zambia -0.4536 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Kiribati
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0058 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0001 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0059 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0059 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0194 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0086 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0008 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0288 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0202 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 5.13 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Kiribati?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Kiribati was -0.4186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Kiribati?
- The highest recorded value was -0.4186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Kiribati?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2013.
- How does Kiribati rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Kiribati ranks 130th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Kiribati?
- Over the last ten years it is up 38.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kiribati data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 22 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.