Kiribati vs Tuvalu: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Kiribati
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports -0.4186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4418 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.0232 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Kiribati ranks 130th and Tuvalu ranks 131st of 206 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Tuvalu in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.9449 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6041 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3408 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | -0.8775 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7722 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1053 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | -0.5442 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5647 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0205 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Kiribati or Tuvalu?
- Kiribati, at -0.4186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4418 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tuvalu as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Kiribati and Tuvalu?
- 0.0232 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tuvalu?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
- How do Kiribati and Tuvalu rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Kiribati ranks 130th and Tuvalu ranks 131st of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.