Kiribati vs Zambia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Kiribati
- Zambia
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports -0.4186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4536 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Zambia, a difference of 0.035 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 130th and Zambia ranks 133rd of 206 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.9449 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3916 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Zambia |
| 2010s | -0.8775 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4715 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.406 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Zambia |
| 2020s | -0.5442 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4707 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0735 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Kiribati or Zambia?
- Kiribati, at -0.4186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4536 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Kiribati and Zambia?
- 0.035 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Zambia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
- How do Kiribati and Zambia rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Kiribati ranks 130th and Zambia ranks 133rd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.