Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Tuvalu
Tuvalu: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate was -0.4022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▲ Rising
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Tuvalu, 2004–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2024, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Tuvalu stood at -0.4022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That represents a change of up 39.7% on the previous year and up 43.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Tuvalu peaked at -0.2448 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2005 and was at its lowest, -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2013.
Tuvalu ranks 128th of 205 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Tuvalu, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | -0.333 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 2005 | -0.2448 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -26.5% |
| 2006 | -0.5613 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +129.3% |
| 2007 | -0.6408 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +14.2% |
| 2008 | -0.9565 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +49.3% |
| 2009 | -0.832 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.0% |
| 2010 | -0.8745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.1% |
| 2011 | -0.8736 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2012 | -1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +21.3% |
| 2013 | -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.1% |
| 2014 | -0.7135 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -34.1% |
| 2015 | -0.6157 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.7% |
| 2016 | -0.5929 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.7% |
| 2017 | -0.6976 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.7% |
| 2018 | -0.5911 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.3% |
| 2019 | -0.5898 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2020 | -0.685 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.1% |
| 2021 | -0.593 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.4% |
| 2022 | -0.5739 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.2% |
| 2023 | -0.6665 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.1% |
| 2024 | -0.4022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -39.7% |
Tuvalu compared with similar countries
- Tuvalu's -0.4022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.1017 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 4.0× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Tuvalu's -0.4022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is -0.071 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 5.7× the median. (34 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.5947 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9565 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2448 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
| 2010s | -0.7691 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5898 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.5841 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.685 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Tuvalu
- 125 Kenya -0.3336 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 126 Bosnia and Herzegovina -0.3498 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 127 Tunisia -0.3901 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 129 Togo -0.4081 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 130 Zambia -0.4207 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 131 Guyana -0.4475 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Tuvalu
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0016 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0016 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0016 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0055 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0039 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0001 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0095 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0055 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 1.45 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Tuvalu?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Tuvalu was -0.4022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Tuvalu?
- The highest recorded value was -0.2448 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2005.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Tuvalu?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2013.
- How does Tuvalu rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Tuvalu ranks 128th out of 205 countries with data for 2024.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Tuvalu?
- Over the last ten years it is up 43.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Tuvalu data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.