Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Tuvalu
Tuvalu: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.4418 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Tuvalu, 2004–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Tuvalu stood at -0.4418 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That represents a change of down 0.4% on the previous year and up 27.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Tuvalu peaked at -0.2402 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2005 and was at its lowest, -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2013.
Tuvalu ranks 131st of 206 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 22 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Tuvalu, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | -0.3545 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 2005 | -0.2402 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -32.2% |
| 2006 | -0.5645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +135.0% |
| 2007 | -0.6464 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +14.5% |
| 2008 | -0.9712 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +50.2% |
| 2009 | -0.8476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.7% |
| 2010 | -0.8879 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.8% |
| 2011 | -0.8857 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2012 | -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +21.1% |
| 2013 | -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.0% |
| 2014 | -0.7093 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -35.2% |
| 2015 | -0.6125 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.7% |
| 2016 | -0.5899 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.7% |
| 2017 | -0.6978 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +18.3% |
| 2018 | -0.5868 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.9% |
| 2019 | -0.5846 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4% |
| 2020 | -0.6819 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.6% |
| 2021 | -0.5889 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.6% |
| 2022 | -0.5709 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.1% |
| 2023 | -0.6646 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.4% |
| 2024 | -0.4401 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -33.8% |
| 2025 | -0.4418 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.4% |
Tuvalu compared with similar countries
- Tuvalu's -0.4418 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 4.7× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Tuvalu's -0.4418 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is -0.0624 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 7.1× the median. (34 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Tuvalu changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | -135.0% | -0.2402 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.6041 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9712 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2402 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
| 2010s | -0.7722 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5846 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.5647 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6819 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4401 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Tuvalu
More reference data data for Tuvalu
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0016 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0016 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0016 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0055 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0039 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0001 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0095 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0055 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 1.45 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Tuvalu?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Tuvalu was -0.4418 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Tuvalu?
- The highest recorded value was -0.2402 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2005.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Tuvalu?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2013.
- How does Tuvalu rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Tuvalu ranks 131st out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Tuvalu?
- Over the last ten years it is up 27.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Tuvalu data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 22 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.