Kiribati vs Palestine, State of: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate

Kiribati
-0.5014 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Palestine, State of
-0.4676 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Kiribati rank
136th
Palestine, State of rank
133rd

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time

  • Kiribati
  • Palestine, State of
-1-0.50199620102024

How they compare

Palestine, State of currently reports -0.4676 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5014 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0338 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 136th and Palestine, State of ranks 133rd of 205 countries.

Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
2000s -0.929 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5949 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.334 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Palestine, State of
2010s -0.857 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7026 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Palestine, State of
2020s -0.5469 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2574 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2894 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Palestine, State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Kiribati or Palestine, State of?
Palestine, State of, at -0.4676 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5014 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kiribati as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Kiribati and Palestine, State of?
0.0338 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Palestine, State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Palestine, State of?
21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Palestine, State of rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Kiribati ranks 136th and Palestine, State of ranks 133rd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Palestine, State of: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kiribati/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kiribati/west-bank-and-gaza/">Kiribati vs Palestine, State of: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 5,160 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.