Brazil vs Kiribati: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Brazil
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports -0.4186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4419 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Brazil, a difference of 0.0233 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 132nd and Kiribati ranks 130th of 206 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0895 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9449 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Brazil |
| 2010s | 0.0261 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8775 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9036 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Brazil |
| 2020s | -0.2591 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5442 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2851 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Brazil or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at -0.4186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4419 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Brazil as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Brazil and Kiribati?
- 0.0233 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kiribati?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Kiribati rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Brazil ranks 132nd and Kiribati ranks 130th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.