Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Central African Republic

Central African Republic: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate was -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▬ Flat

Latest (2024)
-1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Change on year
up 4.5%
World rank
188th
of 205 countries
All-time high
-1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2010
All-time low
-1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2003
Years of data
26
1996–2024

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Central African Republic, 1996–2024

-1.6-1.5-1.4-1.3-1.2-1.11996201020241996: -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.51998: -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.52000: -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.52002: -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.52003: -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.52004: -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.52005: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52006: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52007: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52008: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52009: -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.52010: -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.52011: -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.52012: -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.52013: -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.52014: -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.52015: -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.52016: -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.52017: -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.52018: -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.52019: -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.52020: -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.52021: -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.52022: -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.52023: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52024: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Analysis

In 2024, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Central African Republic stood at -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That represents a change of up 4.5% on the previous year and up 16.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Central African Republic peaked at -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2010 and was at its lowest, -1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2003.

Central African Republic ranks 188th of 205 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Central African Republic, year by year

Annual values for Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Central African Republic, 1996 to 2024.
Year approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Change
1996 -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 —
1998 -1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -2.2%
2000 -1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6%
2002 -1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +2.1%
2003 -1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +10.2%
2004 -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -25.0%
2005 -1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +13.4%
2006 -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +1.2%
2007 -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -3.3%
2008 -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +0.0%
2009 -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -9.7%
2010 -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -6.0%
2011 -1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +1.3%
2012 -1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +2.2%
2013 -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +24.2%
2014 -1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +7.2%
2015 -1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1%
2016 -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -5.6%
2017 -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.0%
2018 -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -3.5%
2019 -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0%
2020 -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2%
2021 -1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +2.1%
2022 -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.7%
2023 -1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -3.0%
2024 -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -4.5%

Central African Republic compared with similar countries

  • Central African Republic's -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for low income countries, which is -1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.2× the median. (25 countries reporting)
  • Central African Republic's -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.7386 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.7× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Central African Republic changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
2004 +25.0% -1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s -1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 2
2000s -1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 9
2010s -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 10
2020s -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 5

Countries ranked near Central African Republic

  1. 185 Belarus -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  2. 186 Comoros -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  3. 187 Bolivia -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  4. 189 Democratic Republic of Congo -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  5. 190 Equatorial Guinea -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  6. 191 Myanmar -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare

See the full ranking of 205 places →

More reference data data for Central African Republic

All data for Central African Republic →

Frequently asked questions

What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Central African Republic?
Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Central African Republic was -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Central African Republic?
The highest recorded value was -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2010.
What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Central African Republic?
The lowest recorded value was -1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2003.
How does Central African Republic rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Central African Republic ranks 188th out of 205 countries with data for 2024.
Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Central African Republic?
Over the last ten years it is up 16.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Central African Republic data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Central African Republic. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/central-african-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/central-african-republic/">Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Central African Republic</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 5,160 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.