Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Central African Republic
Central African Republic: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▬ Flat
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Central African Republic, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Central African Republic stood at -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That represents a change of down 1.8% on the previous year and up 13.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Central African Republic peaked at -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2010 and was at its lowest, -1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2003.
Central African Republic ranks 189th of 206 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Central African Republic, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2% |
| 2000 | -1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2002 | -1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3% |
| 2003 | -1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.6% |
| 2004 | -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -23.8% |
| 2005 | -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.6% |
| 2006 | -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.6% |
| 2007 | -1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.8% |
| 2008 | -1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2009 | -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.4% |
| 2010 | -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.4% |
| 2011 | -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.2% |
| 2012 | -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.9% |
| 2013 | -1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +23.4% |
| 2014 | -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.8% |
| 2015 | -1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.9% |
| 2016 | -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.0% |
| 2017 | -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4% |
| 2018 | -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.7% |
| 2019 | -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0% |
| 2020 | -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0% |
| 2021 | -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.2% |
| 2022 | -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.0% |
| 2023 | -1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.9% |
| 2024 | -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.3% |
| 2025 | -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.8% |
Central African Republic compared with similar countries
- Central African Republic's -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for low income countries, which is -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.2× the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Central African Republic's -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.7299 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.8× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Central African Republic
- 186 Guinea-Bissau -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 187 Belarus -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 188 Zimbabwe -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 190 Democratic Republic of Congo -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 191 Equatorial Guinea -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 192 Afghanistan -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Central African Republic
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1959 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0271 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6569 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.7203 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 15.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 16.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1476 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Central African Republic?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Central African Republic was -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Central African Republic?
- The highest recorded value was -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2010.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Central African Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2003.
- How does Central African Republic rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Central African Republic ranks 189th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Central African Republic?
- Over the last ten years it is up 13.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Central African Republic data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.