Belarus vs Central African Republic: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Belarus
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Belarus currently reports -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 187th and Central African Republic ranks 189th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Central African Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Belarus |
| 2000s | -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0801 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3288 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Belarus |
| 2020s | -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2731 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Belarus or Central African Republic?
- Belarus, at -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Central African Republic as of 2025.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Belarus and Central African Republic?
- 0.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Central African Republic?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Central African Republic rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Belarus ranks 187th and Central African Republic ranks 189th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.