Central African Republic vs Equatorial Guinea: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate

Central African Republic
-1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
-1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Central African Republic rank
187th
Equatorial Guinea rank
189th

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Equatorial Guinea
-1.8-1.6-1.4-1.2199620102024

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 187th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 189th of 204 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s -1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.7 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2901 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Central African Republic
2000s -1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.58 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2489 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Central African Republic
2010s -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1826 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Central African Republic
2020s -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0452 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Central African Republic or Equatorial Guinea?
Central African Republic, at -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea?
0.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Central African Republic ranks 187th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 189th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Equatorial Guinea: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/central-african-republic/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/central-african-republic/equatorial-guinea/">Central African Republic vs Equatorial Guinea: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,143 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.