Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Belarus
Belarus: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Belarus, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Belarus stood at -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.1% on the previous year and down 20.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Belarus peaked at -0.5743 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2019 and was at its lowest, -1.71 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2000.
Belarus ranks 187th of 206 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Belarus, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.66 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +41.8% |
| 2000 | -1.71 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.0% |
| 2002 | -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.0% |
| 2003 | -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.3% |
| 2004 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.5% |
| 2005 | -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.6% |
| 2006 | -1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +30.1% |
| 2007 | -1.55 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.2% |
| 2008 | -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -19.0% |
| 2009 | -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.8% |
| 2010 | -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.8% |
| 2011 | -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.2% |
| 2012 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -18.5% |
| 2013 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.3% |
| 2014 | -0.9876 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.3% |
| 2015 | -1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.6% |
| 2016 | -0.9322 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.6% |
| 2017 | -0.8905 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.5% |
| 2018 | -0.788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.5% |
| 2019 | -0.5743 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -27.1% |
| 2020 | -0.7404 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +28.9% |
| 2021 | -0.8364 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.0% |
| 2022 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +33.1% |
| 2023 | -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.2% |
| 2024 | -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.4% |
| 2025 | -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 13.5× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Belarus's -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.6107 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (54 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.66 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.71 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5743 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7404 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 184 Congo -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 185 Bolivia -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 186 Guinea-Bissau -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 188 Zimbabwe -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 189 Central African Republic -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 190 Democratic Republic of Congo -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Belarus?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Belarus was -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was -0.5743 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2019.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.71 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- How does Belarus rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Belarus ranks 187th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 20.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.