Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Equatorial Guinea
Equatorial Guinea: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate was -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▲ Rising
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Equatorial Guinea, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Equatorial Guinea recorded -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for regulatory quality - governance estimate in 2024.
That represents a change of down 9.4% on the previous year and up 9.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Equatorial Guinea peaked at -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2023 and was at its lowest, -1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1998.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 189th of 204 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.7 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.68 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.58 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.64 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea
- 186 Bolivia -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 187 Central African Republic -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 188 Democratic Republic of Congo -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 190 Myanmar -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 191 Cuba -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 192 Haiti -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Equatorial Guinea
- Spring temperature anomalies 0.4849 °C (2026)
- Summer temperature anomalies 0.6151 °C (2026)
- Temperature anomalies by month 0.9926 °C (2026)
- Men's universal right to vote 1 (2025)
- Democracy 3 (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected 1 (2025)
- Competitive elections 0 (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating 7 (2025)
- Free country 0 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Equatorial Guinea?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Equatorial Guinea was -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2023.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1998.
- How does Equatorial Guinea rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 189th out of 204 countries with data for 2024.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Equatorial Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is up 9.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Equatorial Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.