Afghanistan vs Central African Republic: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Afghanistan
-1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Central African Republic
-1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Afghanistan rank
192nd
Central African Republic rank
189th

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Central African Republic
-2.5-2-1.5-1199620102025

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 192nd and Central African Republic ranks 189th of 206 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Central African Republic Difference Ahead
1990s -2.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Central African Republic
2000s -1.79 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4487 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Central African Republic
2010s -1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0018 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Central African Republic
2020s -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0953 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Afghanistan or Central African Republic?
Central African Republic, at -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Afghanistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Afghanistan and Central African Republic?
0.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Central African Republic?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Afghanistan and Central African Republic rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Afghanistan ranks 192nd and Central African Republic ranks 189th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Central African Republic: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/afghanistan/central-african-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/afghanistan/central-african-republic/">Afghanistan vs Central African Republic: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,391 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.