Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Tunisia
Tunisia: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) was 60 in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Tunisia, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Tunisia recorded 60 for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 50.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Tunisia peaked at 60 in 2018 and was at its lowest, 0, in 2005.
That places Tunisia 94th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0 | — |
| 2006 | 0 | — |
| 2007 | 0 | — |
| 2008 | 0 | — |
| 2009 | 40 | — |
| 2010 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 60 | +50.0% |
| 2019 | 60 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8 | 0 | 40 | 5 |
| 2010s | 44 | 40 | 60 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
- 94 Bangladesh 60 compare
- 94 Pakistan 60 compare
- 94 Russia 60 compare
- 94 Belarus 60 compare
- 94 Cambodia 60 compare
- 94 Finland 60 compare
- 94 Kiribati 60 compare
- 94 Laos 60 compare
- 94 Luxembourg 60 compare
- 94 Mauritania 60 compare
- 94 Mongolia 60 compare
- 94 Nepal 60 compare
- 94 Paraguay 60 compare
- 94 Portugal 60 compare
- 94 Serbia 60 compare
- 94 Sierra Leone 60 compare
- 94 Palestine 60 compare
- 94 Yemen 60 compare
More reference data data for Tunisia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.148 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1317 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4961 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1849 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.07 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7169 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Tunisia?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Tunisia was 60 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 60 in 2018.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2005.
- How does Tunisia rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Tunisia ranks 94th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 50.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.