Tunisia vs Palestine, State of: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Tunisia
60
in 2019
Palestine, State of
60
in 2019
Tunisia rank
94th
Palestine, State of rank
94th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Tunisia
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 60 against 60 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.
Tunisia ranks 94th and Palestine, State of ranks 94th of 191 countries.
Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tunisia | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8 | 60 | 52 | Palestine, State of |
| 2010s | 44 | 60 | 16 | Palestine, State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Tunisia or Palestine, State of?
- Tunisia, at 60 against 60 in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Tunisia and Palestine, State of?
- 0, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Palestine, State of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Tunisia and Palestine, State of rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Tunisia ranks 94th and Palestine, State of ranks 94th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.