Russian Federation vs Tunisia: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Russian Federation
60
in 2019
Tunisia
60
in 2019
Russian Federation rank
94th
Tunisia rank
94th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Russian Federation
- Tunisia
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 60 against 60 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 94th and Tunisia ranks 94th of 191 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 8 | 52 | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 60 | 44 | 16 | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Russian Federation or Tunisia?
- Russian Federation, at 60 against 60 in Tunisia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Russian Federation and Tunisia?
- 0, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Tunisia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Russian Federation and Tunisia rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Russian Federation ranks 94th and Tunisia ranks 94th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.