Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Mauritania
Mauritania: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) was 60 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Mauritania, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Mauritania recorded 60 for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
The figure is up 20.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Mauritania peaked at 60 in 2016 and was at its lowest, 50, in 2005.
That places Mauritania 94th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Mauritania, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 50 | — |
| 2006 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 60 | +20.0% |
| 2017 | 60 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 60 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 60 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 50 | 50 | 5 |
| 2010s | 54 | 50 | 60 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Mauritania
- 94 Bangladesh 60 compare
- 94 Pakistan 60 compare
- 94 Russia 60 compare
- 94 Belarus 60 compare
- 94 Cambodia 60 compare
- 94 Finland 60 compare
- 94 Kiribati 60 compare
- 94 Lao People's Democratic Republic 60 compare
- 94 Luxembourg 60 compare
- 94 Mongolia 60 compare
- 94 Nepal 60 compare
- 94 Paraguay 60 compare
- 94 Portugal 60 compare
- 94 Serbia 60 compare
- 94 Sierra Leone 60 compare
- 94 Tunisia 60 compare
- 94 Palestine 60 compare
- 94 Yemen 60 compare
More reference data data for Mauritania
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0975 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0216 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.327 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1337 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 14.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1178 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Mauritania?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Mauritania was 60 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Mauritania?
- The highest recorded value was 60 in 2016.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Mauritania?
- The lowest recorded value was 50 in 2005.
- How does Mauritania rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Mauritania ranks 94th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) rising or falling in Mauritania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 20.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Mauritania data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.