Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Belarus
Belarus: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) was 60 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Belarus, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Belarus is 60, measured in 2019.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 14.3% on the previous year and up 20.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Belarus peaked at 70 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 10, in 2005.
Belarus ranks 94th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 10 | — |
| 2006 | 10 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 50 | +400.0% |
| 2008 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 70 | +40.0% |
| 2012 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 60 | -14.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34 | 10 | 50 | 5 |
| 2010s | 67 | 50 | 70 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 94 Bangladesh 60 compare
- 94 Pakistan 60 compare
- 94 Russian Federation 60 compare
- 94 Cambodia 60 compare
- 94 Finland 60 compare
- 94 Kiribati 60 compare
- 94 Lao People's Democratic Republic 60 compare
- 94 Luxembourg 60 compare
- 94 Mauritania 60 compare
- 94 Mongolia 60 compare
- 94 Nepal 60 compare
- 94 Paraguay 60 compare
- 94 Portugal 60 compare
- 94 Serbia 60 compare
- 94 Sierra Leone 60 compare
- 94 Tunisia 60 compare
- 94 Palestine, State of 60 compare
- 94 Yemen 60 compare
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Belarus?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Belarus was 60 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 70 in 2011.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 10 in 2005.
- How does Belarus rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Belarus ranks 94th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 20.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.