Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) was 60 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Sierra Leone, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Sierra Leone stood at 60. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Sierra Leone peaked at 60 in 2009 and was at its lowest, 30, in 2005.
Sierra Leone ranks 94th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Sierra Leone, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 30 | — |
| 2006 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 30 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 60 | +100.0% |
| 2010 | 60 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 60 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 60 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 60 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 60 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 60 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 60 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 60 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 60 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 60 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36 | 30 | 60 | 5 |
| 2010s | 60 | 60 | 60 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Sierra Leone
- 94 Bangladesh 60 compare
- 94 Pakistan 60 compare
- 94 Russia 60 compare
- 94 Belarus 60 compare
- 94 Cambodia 60 compare
- 94 Finland 60 compare
- 94 Kiribati 60 compare
- 94 Laos 60 compare
- 94 Luxembourg 60 compare
- 94 Mauritania 60 compare
- 94 Mongolia 60 compare
- 94 Nepal 60 compare
- 94 Paraguay 60 compare
- 94 Portugal 60 compare
- 94 Serbia 60 compare
- 94 Tunisia 60 compare
- 94 Palestine 60 compare
- 94 Yemen 60 compare
More reference data data for Sierra Leone
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0238 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.4498 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.5935 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.12 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.5935 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0797 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.044 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6534 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Sierra Leone?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Sierra Leone was 60 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Sierra Leone?
- The highest recorded value was 60 in 2009.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Sierra Leone?
- The lowest recorded value was 30 in 2005.
- How does Sierra Leone rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Sierra Leone ranks 94th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) rising or falling in Sierra Leone?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Sierra Leone data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.