Tonga vs Zimbabwe: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Tonga
46.67
in 2013
Zimbabwe
46.67
in 2013
Tonga rank
113th
Zimbabwe rank
113th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Tonga
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 46.67 against 46.67 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Tonga ranks 113th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 188 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tonga | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.67 | 46.67 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 46.67 | 46.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Tonga or Zimbabwe?
- Tonga, at 46.67 against 46.67 in Zimbabwe as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Tonga and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tonga and Zimbabwe?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Tonga and Zimbabwe rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Tonga ranks 113th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.