Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Taiwan

Taiwan: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 66.67 in 2013. ▲ Rising

Latest (2013)
66.67
Change on year
up 5.3%
World rank
23rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
66.67
in 2013
All-time low
53.33
in 2005
Years of data
9
2005–2013

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Taiwan, 2005–2013

02040602005200920132005: 53.32006: 53.32007: 53.32008: 53.32009: 53.32010: 53.32011: 53.32012: 63.32013: 66.7

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Taiwan recorded 66.67 for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

The figure is up 5.3% on the previous year and up 25.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Taiwan peaked at 66.67 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 53.33, in 2005.

Taiwan ranks 23rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Taiwan, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Taiwan, 2005 to 2013.
Year Value Change
2005 53.33 —
2006 53.33 +0.0%
2007 53.33 +0.0%
2008 53.33 +0.0%
2009 53.33 +0.0%
2010 53.33 +0.0%
2011 53.33 +0.0%
2012 63.33 +18.8%
2013 66.67 +5.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 53.33 53.33 53.33 5
2010s 59.17 53.33 66.67 4

Countries ranked near Taiwan

  1. 23 Azerbaijan 66.67 compare
  2. 23 Chile 66.67 compare
  3. 23 South Korea 66.67 compare
  4. 23 Kyrgyzstan 66.67 compare
  5. 23 Rwanda 66.67 compare
  6. 23 Saudi Arabia 66.67 compare
  7. 23 Sierra Leone 66.67 compare
  8. 23 Tajikistan 66.67 compare
  9. 23 Trinidad and Tobago 66.67 compare
  10. 23 Turkey 66.67 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Taiwan

All data for Taiwan →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Taiwan?
Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Taiwan was 66.67 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Taiwan?
The highest recorded value was 66.67 in 2013.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Taiwan?
The lowest recorded value was 53.33 in 2005.
How does Taiwan rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Taiwan ranks 23rd out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Taiwan?
Over the last ten years it is up 25.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Taiwan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Taiwan. Statizoid. Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db06-14-methodology-score/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db06-14-methodology-score/taiwan/">Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Taiwan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,719 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.