Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 66.67 in 2013. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Azerbaijan, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Azerbaijan recorded 66.67 for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of up 53.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Azerbaijan peaked at 66.67 in 2008 and was at its lowest, 43.33, in 2005.
That places Azerbaijan 23rd out of 191 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the top quarter.
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Azerbaijan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 43.33 | — |
| 2006 | 43.33 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 43.33 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 66.67 | +53.8% |
| 2009 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
Azerbaijan compared with similar countries
- Azerbaijan's 66.67 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 53.33, 1.3× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Azerbaijan's 66.67 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 60, 1.1× the median. (49 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.67 | 43.33 | 66.67 | 5 |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 66.67 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Azerbaijan
- 23 Chile 66.67 compare
- 23 South Korea 66.67 compare
- 23 Kyrgyzstan 66.67 compare
- 23 Rwanda 66.67 compare
- 23 Saudi Arabia 66.67 compare
- 23 Sierra Leone 66.67 compare
- 23 Taiwan 66.67 compare
- 23 Tajikistan 66.67 compare
- 23 Trinidad and Tobago 66.67 compare
- 23 Turkey 66.67 compare
More reference data data for Azerbaijan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1322 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.94 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1063 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4434 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1605 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.5787 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Azerbaijan?
- Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Azerbaijan was 66.67 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Azerbaijan?
- The highest recorded value was 66.67 in 2008.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Azerbaijan?
- The lowest recorded value was 43.33 in 2005.
- How does Azerbaijan rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Azerbaijan ranks 23rd out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Azerbaijan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 53.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Azerbaijan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.