Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 66.67 in 2013. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Sierra Leone, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2013, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Sierra Leone stood at 66.67. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 17.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Sierra Leone peaked at 66.67 in 2009 and was at its lowest, 56.67, in 2005.
Sierra Leone ranks 23rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Sierra Leone, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 56.67 | — |
| 2006 | 56.67 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 56.67 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 56.67 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 66.67 | +17.6% |
| 2010 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
Sierra Leone compared with similar countries
- Sierra Leone's 66.67 is above the median for low income countries, which is 35, 1.9× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Sierra Leone's 66.67 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 38.33, 1.7× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.67 | 56.67 | 66.67 | 5 |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 66.67 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sierra Leone
- 23 Azerbaijan 66.67 compare
- 23 Chile 66.67 compare
- 23 South Korea 66.67 compare
- 23 Kyrgyzstan 66.67 compare
- 23 Rwanda 66.67 compare
- 23 Saudi Arabia 66.67 compare
- 23 Taiwan 66.67 compare
- 23 Tajikistan 66.67 compare
- 23 Trinidad and Tobago 66.67 compare
- 23 Turkey 66.67 compare
More reference data data for Sierra Leone
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0238 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.4498 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.5935 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.12 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.5935 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0797 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.044 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6534 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Sierra Leone?
- Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Sierra Leone was 66.67 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Sierra Leone?
- The highest recorded value was 66.67 in 2009.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Sierra Leone?
- The lowest recorded value was 56.67 in 2005.
- How does Sierra Leone rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Sierra Leone ranks 23rd out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Sierra Leone?
- Over the last ten years it is up 17.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Sierra Leone data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.