Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Taiwan, China: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Azerbaijan, Republic of
- Taiwan, China
How they compare
Azerbaijan, Republic of currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Taiwan, China, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Taiwan, China ahead.
Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 23rd and Taiwan, China ranks 23rd of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan, Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Taiwan, China in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan, Republic of | Taiwan, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.67 | 53.33 | 0.6666 | Taiwan, China |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 59.17 | 7.5 | Azerbaijan, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Azerbaijan, Republic of or Taiwan, China?
- Azerbaijan, Republic of, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Taiwan, China as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Azerbaijan, Republic of and Taiwan, China?
- 0, with Azerbaijan, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan, Republic of and Taiwan, China?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Azerbaijan, Republic of and Taiwan, China rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 23rd and Taiwan, China ranks 23rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.