Taiwan, China vs Tajikistan: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Taiwan, China
66.67
in 2013
Tajikistan
66.67
in 2013
Taiwan, China rank
23rd
Tajikistan rank
23rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Taiwan, China
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Taiwan, China currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Taiwan, China ahead.
Taiwan, China ranks 23rd and Tajikistan ranks 23rd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Taiwan, China averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Taiwan, China | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.33 | 26 | 27.33 | Taiwan, China |
| 2010s | 59.17 | 61.67 | 2.5 | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Taiwan, China or Tajikistan?
- Taiwan, China, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Tajikistan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Taiwan, China and Tajikistan?
- 0, with Taiwan, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Taiwan, China and Tajikistan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Taiwan, China and Tajikistan rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Taiwan, China ranks 23rd and Tajikistan ranks 23rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.