Rwanda vs Taiwan: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score

Rwanda
66.67
in 2013
Taiwan
66.67
in 2013
Rwanda rank
23rd
Taiwan rank
23rd

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Rwanda
  • Taiwan
0204060200520092013

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Taiwan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Taiwan ahead.

Rwanda ranks 23rd and Taiwan ranks 23rd of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Taiwan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Taiwan Difference Ahead
2000s 34 53.33 19.33 Taiwan
2010s 64.17 59.17 5 Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Rwanda or Taiwan?
Rwanda, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Taiwan as of 2013.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Rwanda and Taiwan?
0, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Taiwan?
9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Rwanda and Taiwan rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Rwanda ranks 23rd and Taiwan ranks 23rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,710 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.