PISA: Female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2 by country

Percentage of 15-year-old female students scoring higher than 420 but lower than or equal to 482 points on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 2, students can interpret and recognize situations in contexts that require no more than direct inference. They can extract relevant information from a single source and...

Countries reporting
53
Highest
28.5%
Greece
Lowest
12.1%
Macao
Median
22.5%
Years covered
16
2003–2018
Data points
303

What the numbers show

PISA: Female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2 is currently reported for 53 countries. The highest value is 28.5% in Greece; the lowest is 12.1% in Macao.

The median across all reporting countries is 22.5%, and the mean is 22.8%.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 2.

Over the past decade 23 countries rose and 30 fell. The largest increase was in Qatar (up 89.6%), and the largest decrease in Macao (down 41.9%).

PISA: Female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level: full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Greece 28.5% 2018 up 1.8% flat
2 Croatia 28.4% 2018 up 1.7% falling
3 Montenegro 28.2% 2018 up 18.0% rising
4 Turkey 27.9% 2018 up 9.5% rising
5 Uruguay 27.2% 2018 up 7.0% rising
6 Latvia 26.9% 2018 down 3.6% rising
7 Thailand 26.4% 2018 down 4.3% flat
8 Qatar 26.3% 2018 up 89.6% rising
9 Russia 26.3% 2018 down 8.9% falling
10 Mexico 26.2% 2018 down 6.7% rising
11 Chile 26.0% 2018 down 1.8% rising
12 United States 26.0% 2018 down 0.3% rising
13 Ireland 25.9% 2018 down 1.5% rising
14 Spain 25.5% 2018 up 0.7% flat
15 Italy 25.3% 2018 down 1.4% falling
16 Serbia 25.2% 2018 down 8.6% falling
17 Lithuania 25.1% 2018 down 4.3% flat
18 Romania 25.1% 2018 down 15.7% falling
19 Jordan 25.0% 2018 up 10.6% rising
20 Bulgaria 24.5% 2018 up 0.6% flat
21 Australia 24.5% 2018 up 14.4% rising
22 Hungary 24.4% 2018 down 0.4% flat
23 New Zealand 23.9% 2018 up 19.7% rising
24 United Kingdom 23.3% 2018 down 13.3% falling
25 Czechia 22.8% 2018 down 5.0% rising
26 Denmark 22.6% 2018 down 7.2% flat
27 Norway 22.5% 2018 down 10.3% falling
28 Iceland 22.3% 2018 down 2.1% rising
29 Israel 22.3% 2018 down 11.9% falling
30 Luxembourg 22.3% 2018 down 11.1% falling
31 Sweden 22.2% 2018 down 5.3% flat
32 Portugal 22.1% 2018 down 13.2% falling
33 Slovenia 22.0% 2018 down 4.9% falling
34 Germany 21.9% 2018 up 10.4% rising
35 France 21.8% 2018 up 0.4% flat
36 Slovakia 21.8% 2018 down 6.8% falling
37 Estonia 21.6% 2018 down 9.5% flat
38 Finland 21.6% 2018 up 44.0% rising
39 Austria 21.6% 2018 down 3.8% flat
40 Canada 21.4% 2018 up 8.5% rising
41 Poland 20.8% 2018 down 17.8% falling
42 Switzerland 20.3% 2018 up 16.4% rising
43 Japan 19.9% 2018 up 9.4% rising
44 Colombia 19.5% 2018 up 15.3% rising
45 Indonesia 19.5% 2018 up 8.5% rising
46 Netherlands 19.1% 2018 down 4.2% flat
47 Belgium 18.8% 2018 up 5.0% rising
48 Argentina 18.3% 2018 down 10.8% flat
49 Brazil 18.0% 2018 up 1.3% rising
50 South Korea 17.8% 2018 up 7.4% falling
51 Tunisia 15.6% 2015 up 2.2% rising
52 Hong Kong 12.9% 2018 down 9.2% falling
53 Macao 12.1% 2018 down 41.9% falling

About this data

Indicator
PISA: Female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2
Source
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 303 data points, 2003–2018
Last refreshed

Percentage of 15-year-old female students scoring higher than 420 but lower than or equal to 482 points on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 2, students can interpret and recognize situations in contexts that require no more than direct inference. They can extract relevant information from a single source and make use of a single representational mode. Students at this level can employ basic algorithms, formulae, procedures, or conventions to solve problems involving whole numbers. They are capable of making literal interpretations of the results. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/