PISA: Female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level in United States of America
United States of America: PISA: Female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level was 26.0% in 2018. ▲ Rising
PISA: Female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level in United States of America, 2003–2018
Source: OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA).
Analysis
United States of America recorded 26.0% for pisa: female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level in 2018.
That represents a change of down 6.8% on the previous year and down 0.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, pisa: female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level in United States of America peaked at 28.5% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 24.6%, in 2003.
United States of America ranks 12th of 53 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
PISA: Female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level in United States of America, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 24.6% | — |
| 2006 | 27.3% | +11.2% |
| 2009 | 26.0% | -4.7% |
| 2012 | 28.5% | +9.4% |
| 2015 | 27.9% | -2.2% |
| 2018 | 26.0% | -6.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.0% | 24.6% | 27.3% | 3 |
| 2010s | 27.4% | 26.0% | 28.5% | 3 |
Countries ranked near United States of America
More reference data data for United States of America
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 19.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 24.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 119.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 20.7 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 119.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 64.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 52.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 133.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 589.96 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 112.69 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is pisa: female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level in United States of America?
- Pisa: female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level in United States of America was 26.0% in 2018, according to OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA).
- What is the highest pisa: female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level recorded in United States of America?
- The highest recorded value was 28.5% in 2012.
- What is the lowest pisa: female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level recorded in United States of America?
- The lowest recorded value was 24.6% in 2003.
- How does United States of America rank for pisa: female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level?
- United States of America ranks 12th out of 53 countries with data for 2018.
- Is pisa: female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). level rising or falling in United States of America?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this United States of America data come from?
- The figures come from OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as part of PISA: Female 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old female students scoring higher than 420 but lower than or equal to 482 points on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 2, students can interpret and recognize situations in contexts that require no more than direct inference. They can extract relevant information from a single source and make use of a single representational mode. Students at this level can employ basic algorithms, formulae, procedures, or conventions to solve problems involving whole numbers. They are capable of making literal interpretations of the results. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/