PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 3 by country

Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 482 but lower than or equal to 545 points on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 3, students can execute clearly described procedures, including those that require sequential decisions. Their interpretations are sufficiently sound to be a base for building a...

Countries reporting
51
Highest
29.4%
Latvia
Lowest
6.4%
Tunisia
Median
24.2%
Years covered
16
2003–2018
Data points
303

What the numbers show

PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 3 is currently reported for 51 countries. The highest value is 29.4% in Latvia; the lowest is 6.4% in Tunisia.

The median across all reporting countries is 24.2%, and the mean is 21.7%.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 5.

Over the past decade 30 countries rose and 21 fell. The largest increase was in Qatar (up 102.8%), and the largest decrease in Tunisia (down 20.8%).

PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 3: full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
2 Latvia 29.4% 2018 up 4.3% rising
3 Estonia 29.0% 2018 down 3.2% flat
4 Finland 28.9% 2018 up 6.7% rising
5 Denmark 28.8% 2018 up 5.3% rising
6 Russia 27.5% 2018 up 9.8% rising
7 Iceland 26.7% 2018 down 2.0% flat
8 Poland 26.5% 2018 up 1.6% flat
9 Norway 26.5% 2018 down 3.8% rising
10 Japan 26.4% 2018 up 2.7% rising
11 Slovenia 26.4% 2018 up 10.2% rising
12 Spain 26.0% 2018 down 2.2% flat
13 Canada 25.9% 2018 down 2.4% flat
14 Sweden 25.7% 2018 up 1.9% flat
15 Italy 25.6% 2018 up 4.0% rising
16 France 25.6% 2018 up 7.3% flat
17 Australia 25.6% 2018 down 0.8% flat
18 United Kingdom 25.5% 2018 down 6.4% flat
19 Hungary 25.2% 2018 down 3.0% flat
20 Lithuania 25.2% 2018 down 0.3% flat
21 Czechia 25.2% 2018 up 3.3% rising
22 New Zealand 25.0% 2018 up 2.6% flat
23 Austria 24.9% 2018 up 8.2% flat
24 Macao 24.8% 2018 down 10.7% falling
25 Portugal 24.5% 2018 down 2.2% flat
26 Switzerland 24.4% 2018 up 6.0% flat
27 Slovakia 24.2% 2018 down 3.0% falling
28 United States 24.1% 2018 down 4.6% flat
29 Germany 24.0% 2018 up 4.1% rising
30 Belgium 23.8% 2018 up 9.0% rising
31 South Korea 23.4% 2018 down 4.2% flat
32 Croatia 23.3% 2018 up 2.8% flat
33 Netherlands 23.2% 2018 down 2.7% flat
35 Greece 22.5% 2018 down 6.2% flat
36 Hong Kong 22.1% 2018 up 0.7% rising
37 Israel 21.0% 2018 up 4.8% rising
38 Turkey 20.4% 2018 up 17.2% rising
39 Serbia 19.2% 2018 down 3.6% flat
40 Bulgaria 18.2% 2018 up 4.2% rising
41 Montenegro 17.9% 2018 up 46.6% rising
42 Romania 17.3% 2018 up 0.1% rising
43 Uruguay 15.8% 2018 down 7.1% falling
44 Chile 15.6% 2018 up 5.8% rising
45 Qatar 14.6% 2018 up 102.8% rising
46 Thailand 14.3% 2018 up 1.8% flat
47 Mexico 13.1% 2018 down 15.8% rising
48 Jordan 12.4% 2018 up 31.2% rising
49 Colombia 10.0% 2018 up 32.4% rising
50 Brazil 9.3% 2018 up 14.1% rising
51 Argentina 8.8% 2018 down 19.0% falling
52 Indonesia 6.8% 2018 up 25.1% flat
53 Tunisia 6.4% 2015 down 20.8% rising

About this data

Indicator
PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 3
Source
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 303 data points, 2003–2018
Last refreshed

Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 482 but lower than or equal to 545 points on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 3, students can execute clearly described procedures, including those that require sequential decisions. Their interpretations are sufficiently sound to be a base for building a simple model or for selecting and applying simple problem- solving strategies. Students at this level can interpret and use representations based on different information sources and reason directly from them. They typically show some ability to handle percentages, fractions and decimal numbers, and to work with proportional relationships. Their solutions reflect that they have engaged in basic interpretation and reasoning. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/