Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in South Sudan

South Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) was 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
3.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
185th
of 191 countries
All-time high
3.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
3.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in South Sudan, 2015–2019

012342015201720192015: 3.5 DB17-20 methodology2016: 3.5 DB17-20 methodology2017: 3.5 DB17-20 methodology2018: 3.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 3.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

South Sudan recorded 3.5 DB17-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.

South Sudan ranks 185th of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in South Sudan, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology) in South Sudan, 2015 to 2019.
Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 3.5 DB17-20 methodology
2016 3.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 3.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 3.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 3.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near South Sudan

  1. 185 Equatorial Guinea 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 185 Lao People's Democratic Republic 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 185 Suriname 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for South Sudan

All data for South Sudan →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in South Sudan?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in South Sudan was 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in South Sudan?
The highest recorded value was 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in South Sudan?
The lowest recorded value was 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does South Sudan rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
South Sudan ranks 185th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this South Sudan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in South Sudan. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/south-sudan/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in South Sudan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.