South Sudan vs Suriname: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
South Sudan
3.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Suriname
3.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
South Sudan rank
185th
Suriname rank
185th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- South Sudan
- Suriname
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 3.5 DB17-20 methodology against 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in Suriname, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
South Sudan ranks 185th and Suriname ranks 185th of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), South Sudan or Suriname?
- South Sudan, at 3.5 DB17-20 methodology against 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in Suriname as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between South Sudan and Suriname?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Suriname?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do South Sudan and Suriname rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- South Sudan ranks 185th and Suriname ranks 185th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.