Statizoid

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) was 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. β–² Rising

Latest (2019)
3.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
184th
of 190 countries
All-time high
3.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2018
All-time low
3 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, 2015–2019

012342015201720192015: 3 DB17-20 methodology2016: 3 DB17-20 methodology2017: 3 DB17-20 methodology2018: 3.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 3.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of stood at 3.5 DB17-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of up 16.7% over five years.

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 184th of 190 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea, Republic of

  1. 184 Lao People's Democratic Republic 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 184 South Sudan, Republic of 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 184 Suriname 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places β†’

More reference data data for Equatorial Guinea, Republic of

All data for Equatorial Guinea, Republic of β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of was 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
The highest recorded value was 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2018.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
The lowest recorded value was 3 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 184th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Equatorial Guinea, Republic of data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of. Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/equatorial-guinea/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.