Equatorial Guinea vs South Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Equatorial Guinea
3.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
South Sudan
3.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
185th
South Sudan rank
185th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- South Sudan
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 3.5 DB17-20 methodology against 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in South Sudan, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 185th and South Sudan ranks 185th of 191 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Equatorial Guinea or South Sudan?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 3.5 DB17-20 methodology against 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Equatorial Guinea and South Sudan?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and South Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 185th and South Sudan ranks 185th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.