Laos vs South Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Laos
3.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
South Sudan
3.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Laos rank
185th
South Sudan rank
185th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Laos
- South Sudan
How they compare
Laos currently reports 3.5 DB17-20 methodology against 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in South Sudan, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Laos ranks 185th and South Sudan ranks 185th of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Laos or South Sudan?
- Laos, at 3.5 DB17-20 methodology against 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Laos and South Sudan?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Laos and South Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Laos ranks 185th and South Sudan ranks 185th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.