Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in شيلي

شيلي: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) was 10 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
10 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
61st
of 190 countries
All-time high
10 DB17-20 methodology
in 2018
All-time low
9 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in شيلي, 2015–2019

02468102015201720192015: 9 DB17-20 methodology2016: 9 DB17-20 methodology2017: 9 DB17-20 methodology2018: 10 DB17-20 methodology2019: 10 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

شيلي recorded 10 DB17-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is up 11.1% over five years.

That places شيلي 61st out of 190 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near شيلي

  1. 60 المكسيك 10.1 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 61 منطقة هونغ كونغ الصينية الإدارية الخاصة 10 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 63 الاتحاد الروسي 9.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 63 Bosnia and Herzegovina 9.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 63 كوستاريكا 9.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 63 Côte d’Ivoire 9.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  7. 63 الجمهورية التشيكية 9.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  8. 63 Jamaica 9.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  9. 63 Malawi 9.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  10. 63 المغرب 9.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  11. 63 نيوزيلندا 9.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  12. 63 Palau 9.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  13. 63 بيرو 9.5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for شيلي

All data for شيلي →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in شيلي?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in شيلي was 10 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in شيلي?
The highest recorded value was 10 DB17-20 methodology in 2018.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in شيلي?
The lowest recorded value was 9 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does شيلي rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
شيلي ranks 61st out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this شيلي data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in شيلي. Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/chile/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in شيلي</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.