Chile vs Peru: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Chile
10 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Peru
9.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Chile rank
61st
Peru rank
63rd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Chile
- Peru
How they compare
Chile currently reports 10 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Peru, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Peru ahead.
Chile ranks 61st and Peru ranks 63rd of 190 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Chile or Peru?
- Chile, at 10 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Chile and Peru?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Peru?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Chile ranks 61st and Peru ranks 63rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.