Chile vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Chile
10 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
New Zealand
9.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Chile rank
61st
New Zealand rank
63rd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Chile
- New Zealand
How they compare
Chile currently reports 10 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in New Zealand, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was New Zealand ahead.
Chile ranks 61st and New Zealand ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Chile or New Zealand?
- Chile, at 10 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Chile and New Zealand?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Zealand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Chile and New Zealand rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Chile ranks 61st and New Zealand ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.