Chile vs Mexico: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Chile
10 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Mexico
10.1 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Chile rank
61st
Mexico rank
60th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Chile
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 10.1 DB17-20 methodology against 10 DB17-20 methodology in Chile, a difference of 0.1 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 61st and Mexico ranks 60th of 190 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Chile or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 10.1 DB17-20 methodology against 10 DB17-20 methodology in Chile as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Chile and Mexico?
- 0.1 DB17-20 methodology, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mexico?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Mexico rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Chile ranks 61st and Mexico ranks 60th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.