Chile vs Jamaica: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Chile
10 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Jamaica
9.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Chile rank
61st
Jamaica rank
63rd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Chile
- Jamaica
How they compare
Chile currently reports 10 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Jamaica, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 61st and Jamaica ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Chile or Jamaica?
- Chile, at 10 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Jamaica as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Chile and Jamaica?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Jamaica?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Jamaica rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Chile ranks 61st and Jamaica ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.