Chile vs Malawi: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Chile
10 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Malawi
9.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Chile rank
61st
Malawi rank
63rd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Chile
- Malawi
How they compare
Chile currently reports 10 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Malawi, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 61st and Malawi ranks 63rd of 190 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Chile or Malawi?
- Chile, at 10 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Malawi as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Chile and Malawi?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malawi?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Malawi rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Chile ranks 61st and Malawi ranks 63rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.