Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Hong Kong

Hong Kong: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score was 84.38 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
84.38
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
5th
of 184 countries
All-time high
84.38
in 2013
All-time low
81.25
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Hong Kong, 2003–2014

0204060802003200820142003: 81.22004: 81.22005: 81.22006: 81.22007: 81.22008: 81.22009: 81.22010: 81.22011: 81.22012: 81.22013: 84.42014: 84.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Hong Kong is 84.38, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

That represents a change of up 3.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Hong Kong peaked at 84.38 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 81.25, in 2003.

Hong Kong ranks 5th of 184 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Hong Kong, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Hong Kong, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 81.25 —
2004 81.25 +0.0%
2005 81.25 +0.0%
2006 81.25 +0.0%
2007 81.25 +0.0%
2008 81.25 +0.0%
2009 81.25 +0.0%
2010 81.25 +0.0%
2011 81.25 +0.0%
2012 81.25 +0.0%
2013 84.38 +3.8%
2014 84.38 +0.0%

Hong Kong compared with similar countries

  • Hong Kong's 84.38 is above the median for high income countries, which is 59.38, 1.4× the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • Hong Kong's 84.38 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 53.12, 1.6× the median. (27 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 81.25 81.25 81.25 7
2010s 82.5 81.25 84.38 5

Countries ranked near Hong Kong

  1. 3 Rwanda 93.75 compare
  2. 4 Austria 87.5 compare
  3. 5 Belgium 84.38 compare
  4. 5 Luxembourg 84.38 compare
  5. 5 Netherlands 84.38 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Hong Kong

All data for Hong Kong →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Hong Kong?
Enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Hong Kong was 84.38 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Hong Kong?
The highest recorded value was 84.38 in 2013.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Hong Kong?
The lowest recorded value was 81.25 in 2003.
How does Hong Kong rank for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Hong Kong ranks 5th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Hong Kong?
Over the last ten years it is up 3.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Hong Kong data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Hong Kong. Statizoid. Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/hong-kong-sar-china/">Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Hong Kong</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.