Hong Kong vs Rwanda: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Hong Kong
84.38
in 2014
Rwanda
93.75
in 2014
Hong Kong rank
5th
Rwanda rank
3rd
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Hong Kong
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 93.75 against 84.38 in Hong Kong, a difference of 9.37.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 5th and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.25 | 88.84 | 7.59 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 82.5 | 92.5 | 10 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Hong Kong or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 93.75 against 84.38 in Hong Kong as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Hong Kong and Rwanda?
- 9.37, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Rwanda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong and Rwanda rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Hong Kong ranks 5th and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.